Last One, our 2:51 dark fantasy short and the first film in the Lolly series, is now entered in twelve festivals in seven countries: Canada, the United Kingdom, Israel, Italy, the Czech Republic, South Korea and Mexico. The first answers arrive on October 16. To get to those twelve, we reviewed more than thirty festivals and dropped most of them.
Entered is not selected. We will publish selections here when they happen, not before. This article is about the filter: how we decided where a fully generated film should compete, and why the same filter applies to any award a brand puts on its website.
The film
In a city where cruelty has become casual and looking away is easier than caring, a mysterious young woman walks through the lives of strangers with a lollipop in her mouth and an unsettling calm in her eyes.
She watches.
A man humiliated for being different. An old soul forgotten on the sidewalk. A cashier trapped behind a counter. Small moments of intimidation, indifference, and fear: the kind the world has learned to ignore.
But she doesn’t ignore them.
With a simple snap of her fingers, the balance shifts.
Last One is a dark, surreal short film about the quiet choices that define us: who we protect, who we abandon, and what happens when someone finally decides that enough is enough.
Because sometimes the most dangerous person in the room isn’t the one making the most noise.
It’s the one who has been watching the whole time.
A circuit that is barely three years old
Festivals dedicated to AI film are new. Most of the ones we looked at are in their first, second or third edition, and their quality varies far more than on the traditional circuit. Some screen in real cinemas in front of a named jury. Others run monthly online competitions with dozens of categories and a winner every few weeks.
From the outside, their laurels look identical. A laurel from a festival that screened forty films in a cinematheque and one from a festival that hands out awards every month use the same leaf shape and the same gold. The only way to tell them apart is to read the rules, so that is what we did.
The five questions we asked every festival
1. Can we even enter?
A surprising number of AI festivals are closed to us before quality comes into it. Two well known editions only accept creators based in their own country. Others set a runtime window that a 2:51 film misses, such as a five minute minimum for shorts. Some ask the film to answer a theme, or to be made with one specific generation tool. We checked eligibility first, because a non refundable fee on an ineligible film is money thrown away.
2. Who decides?
We looked for a named jury and an organizer we could identify. The festivals we ruled out on this question shared a pattern: fifty or more categories, winners announced every month, a laurel for every level from finalist to honourable mention, and in one case a statuette that winners pay for. That model is built to sell laurels rather than to select films, and it is common in the AI circuit because the circuit is young and the demand for recognition is high.
3. Where does it screen?
A festival with a street address, a real screen and a date carries more weight than an online gallery. Eleven of the twelve festivals Last One is entered in screen in a physical venue, including the IET in London, the Tel Aviv Cinematheque, Lucerna Palace in Prague, Innis Town Hall in Toronto and the Seoul Film Center. The twelfth runs online.
4. What does it ask about the AI?
This is the question that does not exist on the traditional circuit. Some festivals require AI in every phase of production. Others require every sound to be generated, with no stock music or effects. One asked us to attest that we hold the rights to everything in the film, model outputs included. Several want a written account of the workflow.
A film made from documented reference sheets and written master prompts answers these questions in an afternoon, because the paper trail already exists. A film made from loose generations, with no record of what came from where, cannot answer them honestly. For an AI film, the entry form is now part of the craft.
5. What does it allow before the festival?
Premiere rules decide whether the film can be online during the run. None of the festivals on our list rules out a film that has been shown or published before, as far as their published rules go. Some larger festivals do require a premiere, and that was our trade-off: we released Last One publicly on October 5, because a finished film does more work in front of an audience than in a private link. Those festivals are off our list for this film.
Read the rights clause as well. One festival on our list reserves the right to make the full film available to the public in its online program. That is fine for a film already released, and worth knowing before entering one that is not.
One more filter sat outside the five: attendance. One of the most prestigious festivals we considered expects selected filmmakers to attend in person, with travel at their own cost. That is a fair rule, and it ruled the festival out for us this season.
Where Last One is entered
Twelve festivals, by screening date. Selection notices arrive between October 16, 2026 and February 15, 2027.
- Oct 24, 2026AI Independent Montreal FestivalSPKR.Studio, Montreal
- Oct 29 to Nov 4, 2026All Is Prompt AI Film FestivalOnline, organized from Mexico City
- Nov 7 to 8, 2026AI Movie Awards (AIMA)IET London, Savoy Place, London
- Nov 10, 2026Tel Aviv AI Film FestivalTel Aviv Cinematheque, Tel Aviv
- Nov 14 to 15, 2026AI London Film FestivalClose-Up Cinema, London
- Nov 22, 2026Florence AI FestivalPalazzo San Niccolò, Florence
- Nov 28, 2026PAIFF Prague AI Film FestivalLucerna Palace, Prague
- Dec 5, 2026GenTO: Toronto AI Film FestivalInnis Town Hall, Toronto
- Dec 17 to 19, 2026Korea AI Cinema Festival (KACF)Seoul Film Center, Seoul
- Jan 18, 2027Montreal AI Indie FestivalMontreal
- Feb 20, 2027Veritas AI Film FestivalImagine Cinemas Carlton, Toronto
- Mar 5, 2027AI CINEMA Film FestivalFunamis, Montreal
One entry was free and the most expensive was about US$40 per category. That one had the strongest venue and jury, which is roughly how it should be.
Why this matters beyond film
Brands collect laurels too: industry awards, "best of" lists, badges on a landing page. A buyer who takes thirty seconds to look one up will find out whether it came from a jury or from a checkout page, and a weak badge costs more trust than no badge at all.
We applied to our own film the test we would want a client to apply to us: can the recognition be checked, who granted it, and what did it take to get it. Generative tools make content cheap to produce. They make credibility worth more, because the volume of everything else keeps going up.
We wrote about how the film itself was made in Who Deserves to Be Saved? The Making of Last One.